Analysis of the APRM process
Analysis of the APRM system from the South African Journal of International Affairs, Vol 14, Issue 1, Summer/Autumn 2007 ( by Ross Herbert and Steven Gruzd, SAIIA)
This survey recommends that the issue of protected disclosures be added as an indicator of good economic governance and management.
View file (269.67 kB)
This paper assesses the benefits that the APRM has brought to the continent, and the obstacles that militate against success.
This article seeks to assess both the AU and Nepads achievements in terms of institution- and capacity-building.
This paper analyses the African Union and the New Partnership for Africa's Development in the context of African governance.
This paper argues that the right of Access to Information has been endorsed by the African Union, the APRM's parent body, and is a core principle of democracy.
This paper provides an overview of the APRM, points out its unique approach to governance in Africa and recognises the key challenges faced by the process (2007).
In 2003 African leaders asked the UN Economic Commission for Africa and the OECD to undertake periodic reviews of progress in delivering these commitments (by the Economic Commission for Africa and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
This paper discusses the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) in the context of responsiveness and accountability (by Sanusha Naidu)
This paper analyses Africa’s continental integration process is through three interrelated paradoxes: sovereignty, value and interest ( by Martin Welz)
The paper examines whether given African problems of political disorder and economic malfunction, it is likely that democratic processes as advocated by NEPAD are going to succeed.
This paper focuses on the theoretical opportunities inherent in the processes of the APRM as well as the practical challenges it faces.
A review of the strengths and weaknesses of peer review written at the inception of the mechanism. (by Ross Herbert, SAIIA)
The paper provides a descriptive analysis of the African Peer Review Mechanism and applauds it for being an African initiative to promote democracy on the continent.
This paper examines the role played by traditional justice mechanisms in dealing with the legacy of violent conflict in five African countries.
This practical handbook - designed primarily for technical research institutes, but of value to anyone involved in any capacity.
This article discusses how the use of public opinion surveys could assist the APRM in its reviews (by Robert Mattes)