Monday, November 20, 2017
  • 1

Select your language / Sélectionnez votre langue

South Africa / Afrique du Sud

South Africa

Country facts

South Africa
Date of accession to the APRM March 2003
Review status 1st review completed
Country Review Report publication date  September 2007
NPoA status 3 progress reports published


Faits de Pays

Afrique du Sud
Date d'accession au MAEP Mars 2003
Statut de l’évaluation 1ère évaluation achevée
Date de publication du Rapport d’évaluation national Septembre 2007
Statut du PAN Publication de trois rapports préliminaires

 

This is the APRM Country Review Report Summary for the Republic of South Africa

icon Arabic (491.38 kB)

icon English (331.39 kB)

icon French (390.85 kB)

icon Portuguese (373.58 kB)

Published in South Africa

South Africa’s constitutional democracy reserves a specific role for the judiciary in upholding human rights. This responsibility inevitably has an impact on the formulation and conduct of South Africa’s foreign policy. The constitution is clear in mandating that all public power be exercised in accordance with the rule of law; that it be rational; and that relevant considerations be taken into account and given appropriate weight to ensure informed  and accountable decision-making. This is as true for foreign policy as it is for any other type of governmental policy, making it susceptible to judicial scrutiny. It is the constitution that is to be the ‘light that guides our foreign affairs’. (by Nicole Fritz)icon View file (142.7 kB)

Published in Research

South Africa's 2007 African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) Country Review Report (CRR) identified numerous governance challenges. The country committed itself to eradicating these challenges through implementing a National Programme of Action (NPoA). However, seven years later, these challenges persist and the APRM has fallen off the public radar. In January 2014, South Africa launched its third APRM NPoA implementation report, to show what progress has been achieved since the last implementation report in 2011. This policy briefing critically analyses the latest report and comes to the conclusion that, while reporting on APRM matters has improved significantly since the first two efforts, it is still unclear what value the APRM brings to enhancing governance in South Africa. Specifically, failures to link the NPoA to domestic policies and incorporate it in the National Development Plan (NDP) indicate that the APRM is largely being used in a foreign policy context by the government. (by Yarik Turianskyi, SAIIA)

icon View file (280.46 kB)

 

Published in Research

South Africa's Third APRM NPoA implementation report (2014)

icon View file (2.86 MB)

 

Published in South Africa

This is South Africa's Second APRM NPoA Implementation Report (2010)

icon View file (2.49 MB)

Published in South Africa

South Africa attempted to distill the APRM Questionnaire down to 4 pages but had significant problems with its survey due to problems in the design of this form.

icon View file (1015.85 kB)

Published in   APRM Survey Forms

South Africa's First APRM NPoA implementation report

icon View file (377.54 kB)

Published in South Africa

This collective and independent submission was made to the South African APRM review process by three civil society organisations. 

icon View file (2.62 MB)

Published in South Africa

South African Technical Report Summary on Economic Governance and Management Power: A summary of issues raised in submissions, points of agreement and contention delivered on 7 April 2006 at the Indaba Hotel in Johannesburg.  (by SAIIA) 

icon View file (335.5 kB)

Published in South Africa
Page 1 of 2